Medicare Helps Obama in Battleground States
A new poll shows that among all registered voters the desire to maintain Medicare the way it currently is peaks in Florida at 65%. Twenty percent of the voters in the United States in 2008 were 65 years of age or older. In general, the more Medicare is focused on by voters, the more likely they will support Obama in his re-election bid.
Medicare, the health program from the federal government for the disabled and elderly, has an uncertain future and is currently a hot topic in the presidential campaign between President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney.
Since Paul Ryan was chosen as Romney’s running mate last month and is the House Budget Committee’s chair the topic has been on the top of the list for many. Ryan authored a proposal that would make Medicare more voucher oriented in an overall attempt to lower the deficit. The proposal has been considered bold, but politically risky given the popularity of Medicare.
Obama also faces problems with voters due to healthcare, but the attention given recently to Medicare has blunted the fallout from the healthcare reform law of 2010.
Romney has charged that President Obama raided the Medicare program to pay for his Obamacare. That criticism comes from the cuts of $716 billion in Medicare that resulted from the healthcare law, cuts that were previously supported by Romney’s running mate Ryan, but ones he now says he would undo.
However, because of voter distaste for the Ryan-like proposal, it appears that Medicare is having a positive effect with voters in favor of Obama. Many voters in Virginia who are over 60 years of age said they would vote for Obama because of the differences they have over Medicare with Romney.

Most voters…or at least the 55 and older vote….may like the way Medicare in NOW….but…but….Obama said all he did was stretch it out for 8 years. How this was done,,,no one in the press has ask that question of this ‘so called prez’! PEOPLE MAY WANT TO KEEP IT LIKE IT IS….BUT ….APPARENTLY THEY DON’T CARE AFTER 8 YEARS????
NO WONDER THIS COUNTRY IS IN THE FISCAL MESS IT IS…THE AMERICAN VOTER DOESN’T EVEN UNDERSTAND ECONOMICS AND THE PICKLE THIS COUNTRY IS IN WITH THE DEFICIT. TEA PARTY MEMBER OR NOT…AMERICA YOU HAD BETTER WAKE UP…”"”AS WHEN THE FISCAL CLIFF IS HIT..AND I DON’T MEAN THE CURRENT FISCAL CLIFF…BUT THIS COUNTRY IN LESS THAN 4 YEARS UNDER THE SAME FISCAL RESPOSIBILE OF THE CURRENT PREZ….THIS COUNTRY WILL HAVE TO DO CUTS TO ”’EVERYTHING”’ IN THE BUDGET AS WELL AS MEDICARE…..THEN EVERY POLITICIAN WILL BE POLITICALLY CORRECT THAT THE ”’CUTS THEY HAVE TO MAKE TO MEDICARE IN 4 YEARS WILL NOT BE SOMETHING THEY WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR BY THE VOTERS BECAUSE THE USA IS ‘BROKE’! GEEZ THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE REALLY QUITE STUPID AS A ‘WHOLE’!!!!!!
Dude, turn your caps lock off. Seriously.
My understanding is that children with autism,Elderly/Seniors, and the disabled will be severely affected by the changes that will occur January 2013 if Romney and Ryan gets into office. Ryan said Medicaid will be cut effectively in January 2013 so I can’t imagine two men who claim to have faith in God, one a Mormon and one a catholic being so heartless to people who up until this point has been nameless and faceless who will most likely be devastated by these cuts. You mean to tell me that ONLY these groups of people should be TARGETED first? I remember reading that Hitler exterminated the mentally disabled first so he wouldn’t have to take care of them and its seems we have a callous spirit in both Romney and Ryan. Ryan said h would send people to Catholic Charities but the clergy from Nuns on The Bus said they have people going to food centers for 3 meals a day already due to the first round of the recession that has not fully made people whole so they cannot understand why men of faith would disregard the less fortunate FIRST. I will not be voting for Romney Ryan
I agree with Alex.
Frankly I am not all that convinced Darrell understands the complexity of healthcare reform or economics. Sounds like a regurgitation of what opponents are saying.
Although it is true that some of us want something for nothing, it is not true that everyone who takes government assistance expects a handout . Some people – like disabled veterans for instance – earned their coverage and we should be glad to give them free care and stop arguing dollars and cents.
This is far more complex than we tend to treat it.
Tax my liquor, tax my weed, tax my gym shoes and tax my mother in laws outrageous wigs, but why do we have to target the Seniors,mentally disabled, the elderly and children with autism FIRST. We men know that if we smoke cigars and go out on mindless dates we waste alot of money on females,male stuff that we will buy no matter the price. Tax that stuff. so why not take money out of frivilous stuff to fund our less fortunate people in society because thats morally a first start by brainstorming to say lets protect these people who can’t protect themselves and getting old should not be a crime or give any candidates reason to target them. The model for Medicare works as it is we just need to have our youngest in society fund it and people who are rich pay their taxes and tax their fish eggs and louis vutton purchases too
We see similar ratios in studies where news people are asked to rate themselves on the left-to-right political spectrum:
In a 1981 study of 240 journalists nationwide, 65% identified themselves as liberals, 17% as conservatives.
In a 1983 study of news reporters, executives, and staffers, 32% identified themselves as liberals, 11% as conservatives.
In a 1992 study of more than 1,400 journalists, 44% identified themselves as liberals, 22% as conservatives.
In a 1996 study of Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, 61% identified themselves as liberals, 9% as conservatives.
In a 1996 study of 1,037 journalists, the respondents identified themselves as liberals 4 times more frequently than as conservatives. Among journalists working for newspapers with circulations exceeding 50,000, the ratio of liberals to conservatives was 5.4 to 1.
In a 2004 Pew Research Center study of journalists and media executives, the ratio of self-identified liberals to conservatives was 4.9 to 1.
In a 2007 Pew Research Center study of journalists and news executives, the ratio was 4 liberals for each conservative.
@William, thanks for the research it is enlightening; I also think you have to keep in mind there are other variables that you haven’t mentioned. I went to school for Communications and although I was never considering journalism there are a few things I had to be aware of. Journalist don’t have FULL POWER AND CONTROL over what makes the news, its the Editor,Owners of the Newspapers and most time these people are swayed by the Advertisers who the news sources depend on to stay in business. For instance We in America have much more brevity, if you will, to have free speech and even if views as a news person is rejected in a article. The Editor and chief can assign another person to edit that piece so it can have a mass appeal at the same time using caution not to get on the bad side of advertisers who are colleagues with the people that the story is about. One of my good friends Victor from Cuba said Advertisers determine the news of the day because the newspapers are dependent on their money to keep the newspapers in business and no matter who your are as a journalist you can be arrested and imprisoned for using free speech that is considered illegal depending on who you decide to do a story on especially if there corruption involved, a journalist can even end up missing. Notwithstanding, Romney has himself to blame for his eccentric and arrogant demeanor and that’s an entirely different topic concerning why the media has grown impatient with all the re-seting,rebooting, and re-focusing of his campaign that keeps leaving out Specifics and details of his budget and the math not adding up. Lastly, We have to remember the journalist from the Daily Caller who kept interrupting the President when reporters were told before hand there would be no questions during which time the president was speaking at a news brief. Journalist are supposed to be neutral and 85% of the time they are regardless of their political views except for Fox news which is rare. My point is this: Romney’s campaign team underestimated Twitter, Facebook and social Media’s interaction in real-time and the journalist can’t be held responsible for the voters and citizens of the world Twitting hundreds of thousands followers of followers of followers- its like a chain letter just more effective faster. People are “sharing” on facebook 24 hours a day and Romney’s gaffes would be missed by 70% of the population if this was 1968 but its not. The tongue is a beast that must be controlled and blaming the media for what has come out of his mouth is very unfair. In closing, journalist are intelligent enough not to get on the current administrations poop list where they will be barred or denied access in the future to interviews or news briefings in the event that Obama does get re-elected. when Romney was ahead in the polls no one had any concerns but now that Romney is trailing theres this apparent backlash against the media is just grasping for straws that aren’t there. Romney has gone on a world tour and had a Bipolar moment each time spewing things at people that he felt he was above or smarter than. So his own condescending views have come out in the polls on how people view him