Financial Comparison: Global Self Storage (NASDAQ:SELF) and SL Green Realty (NYSE:SLG)

SL Green Realty (NYSE:SLG) and Global Self Storage (NASDAQ:SELF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares SL Green Realty and Global Self Storage’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SL Green Realty	-9.66%	-2.44%	-0.86%
Global Self Storage	14.13%	3.81%	2.76%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares SL Green Realty and Global Self Storage”s revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SL Green Realty	$1.00 billion	2.88	-$88.28 million	($1.61)	-25.14
Global Self Storage	$12.53 million	4.61	$2.12 million	$0.16	31.81

Global Self Storage has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SL Green Realty. SL Green Realty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Self Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

SL Green Realty pays an annual dividend of $3.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.6%. Global Self Storage pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. SL Green Realty pays out -191.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Self Storage pays out 181.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SL Green Realty has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. SL Green Realty is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

SL Green Realty has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Self Storage has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.0% of SL Green Realty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.9% of Global Self Storage shares are held by institutional investors. 5.0% of SL Green Realty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Global Self Storage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for SL Green Realty and Global Self Storage, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SL Green Realty	3	9	7	0	2.21
Global Self Storage	0	1	0	0	2.00

SL Green Realty currently has a consensus price target of $54.30, indicating a potential upside of 34.17%. Given SL Green Realty’s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe SL Green Realty is more favorable than Global Self Storage.

Summary

SL Green Realty beats Global Self Storage on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

About SL Green Realty

3SL Green Realty Corp., Manhattan’s largest office landlord, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust, or REIT, that is focused primarily on acquiring, managing and maximizing value of Manhattan commercial properties. As of June 30, 2022, SL Green held interests in 64 buildings totaling 34.4 million square feet. This included ownership interests in 26.3 million square feet of Manhattan buildings and 7.2 million square feet securing debt and preferred equity investments.

About Global Self Storage

Global Self Storage is a self-administered and self-managed REIT that owns, operates, manages, acquires, and redevelops self-storage properties. The company's self-storage properties are designed to offer affordable, easily accessible and secure storage space for residential and commercial customers. Through its wholly owned subsidiaries, the company owns and/or manages 13 self-storage properties in Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Oklahoma.