Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE:HPP – Get Free Report) and JBG SMITH Properties (NYSE:JBGS – Get Free Report) are both small-cap real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.
Insider & Institutional Ownership
97.6% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of JBG SMITH Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Hudson Pacific Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of JBG SMITH Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Analyst Ratings
This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Hudson Pacific Properties and JBG SMITH Properties, as provided by MarketBeat.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| Hudson Pacific Properties | 3 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2.08 |
| JBG SMITH Properties | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.00 |
Earnings & Valuation
This table compares Hudson Pacific Properties and JBG SMITH Properties”s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| Hudson Pacific Properties | $831.10 million | 0.76 | -$561.69 million | ($8.85) | -1.32 |
| JBG SMITH Properties | $498.60 million | 1.24 | -$139.06 million | ($2.61) | -4.05 |
JBG SMITH Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hudson Pacific Properties. JBG SMITH Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudson Pacific Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Volatility & Risk
Hudson Pacific Properties has a beta of 1.89, indicating that its share price is 89% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, JBG SMITH Properties has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Profitability
This table compares Hudson Pacific Properties and JBG SMITH Properties’ net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| Hudson Pacific Properties | -70.04% | -20.76% | -7.73% |
| JBG SMITH Properties | -29.89% | -13.31% | -3.49% |
Summary
JBG SMITH Properties beats Hudson Pacific Properties on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
About Hudson Pacific Properties
Hudson Pacific Properties (NYSE: HPP) is a real estate investment trust serving dynamic tech and media tenants in global epicenters for these synergistic, converging and secular growth industries. Hudson Pacific's unique and high-barrier tech and media focus leverages a full-service, end-to-end value creation platform forged through deep strategic relationships and niche expertise across identifying, acquiring, transforming and developing properties into world-class amenitized, collaborative and sustainable office and studio space.
About JBG SMITH Properties
JBG SMITH Properties is a real estate investment trust, which engages in owning, operating, investing in, and developing a portfolio of mixed-use properties. It operates through the following segments: Multifamily, Commercial, and Other. The Multifamily segment refers to the commercial buildings with public areas, retail spaces, and walkable streets. The Commercial segment rents to federal government tenants. The Other segment relates to development assets, corporate entities, land assets for which are the ground lessor and the elimination of inter-segment activity. The company was founded on October 27, 2016, and is headquartered in Bethesda, MD.
Receive News & Ratings for Hudson Pacific Properties Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Hudson Pacific Properties and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
