National Vision (NASDAQ:EYE – Get Free Report) and Lands’ End (NASDAQ:LE – Get Free Report) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.
Profitability
This table compares National Vision and Lands’ End’s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.
| Net Margins | Return on Equity | Return on Assets | |
| National Vision | 2.47% | 6.78% | 3.01% |
| Lands’ End | 26.62% | 7.96% | 3.38% |
Institutional & Insider Ownership
37.5% of Lands’ End shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of National Vision shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Lands’ End shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
Valuation and Earnings
This table compares National Vision and Lands’ End”s top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.
| Gross Revenue | Price/Sales Ratio | Net Income | Earnings Per Share | Price/Earnings Ratio | |
| National Vision | $1.99 billion | 0.66 | $29.60 million | $0.61 | 27.20 |
| Lands’ End | $1.34 billion | 0.21 | $5.51 million | $11.24 | 0.85 |
National Vision has higher revenue and earnings than Lands’ End. Lands’ End is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Vision, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Volatility & Risk
National Vision has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lands’ End has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Analyst Ratings
This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for National Vision and Lands’ End, as reported by MarketBeat.
| Sell Ratings | Hold Ratings | Buy Ratings | Strong Buy Ratings | Rating Score | |
| National Vision | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2.64 |
| Lands’ End | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2.50 |
National Vision currently has a consensus price target of $29.82, suggesting a potential upside of 79.74%. Lands’ End has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 110.30%. Given Lands’ End’s higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lands’ End is more favorable than National Vision.
About National Vision
National Vision Holdings, Inc., through its subsidiaries, operates as an optical retailer in the United States. The company operates in two segments, Owned & Host and Legacy. It offers eyeglasses and contact lenses, and optical accessory products; provides eye exams through its America’s Best, Eyeglass World, Vista Optical, Fred Meyer, and Vista Optical military, as well as Vision Center branded stores; and offers health maintenance organization and optometric services. National Vision Holdings, Inc. was founded in 1990 and is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.
About Lands’ End
Lands’ End, Inc. operates as a digital retailer of apparel, swimwear, outerwear, accessories, footwear, home products, and uniform in the United States, Europe, Asia, and internationally. It operates through U.S. eCommerce, International, Outfitters, Third Party, and Retail segments. The company also sells uniform and logo apparel. It sells its products through e-commerce and company operated stores, as well as through third party distribution channels under the Lands’ End, Lands’ End Lighthouse, Squall, Tugless Tank, Drifter, Outrigger, and Marinac, Beach Living brands, as well as Supima, No-Gape, Starfish, Little Black Suit, Iron Knees, Hyde Park, Year’ Rounder, ClassMate, Willis & Geiger, and ThermaCheck brands. Lands’ End, Inc. was founded in 1963 and is headquartered in Dodgeville, Wisconsin.
Receive News & Ratings for National Vision Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for National Vision and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.
